Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
2421 Intellectual laziness is damaging the nation Michael Danielsen 731
2422 TRA explicates US view of Taiwan Liberty Times Editorial 775
2423 We must not be fooled by the talk of a ‘peace bonus’ Lin Cheng-yi 林正義 582
2424 Beans are spilled — ECFA is political J. Michael Cole 寇謐將 803
2425 Investigations similar to puzzles Taipei Times Editorial 608
2426 There aren’t constants in our lives or government Peng Ming-min 彭明敏 618
2427 Updating the US’ policy on Taiwan Richard Zalski 1083
2428 Beijing’s failed policy on Taiwan Taipei Times 667
2429 ROC forced citizenship on unwary Taiwanese Chen Yi-nan 陳逸南 720
2430 Seeking an overlapping consensus Frank Hsieh 謝長廷 615
2431 Sweeping Taiwan under the carpet Taipei Times Editorial 632
2432 Ukraine — a mirror to Taiwan’s transition Yang Shin-nan 楊信男 759
2433 Preferential 18% interest rate is not defensible Hu Wen-hui 胡文輝 755
2434 Time is running out for defense Wang Jyh-perng 王志鵬 722
2435 Fighting for abolition of preferential treatment Lin Chia 林洽 692
2436 Reviews for referendums need to be re-examined Chen Miao-fen 陳妙芬 685
2437 Voters can either save Ma or save the nation James Wang 王景弘 670
2438 Lee denies suggesting joint ticket Taipei Times 644
2439 US-Taiwan draft treaty proposed Taipei Times 658
2440 Stop fabricating Taiwan’s history Liberty Times Editorial 1168
 
Page 122 of 145

Newsflash

President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) proposal for a possible peace accord with China within a 10-year time frame could put Taiwan’s sovereignty and democratic values at risk and leave future generations with no freedom of choice, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said yesterday.

Speaking as the head of her party, Tsai, the DPP’s presidential candidate in January’s election, told a press conference that Ma’s proposal was “irresponsible and impetuous” and that it amounted to the manipulation of a highly sensitive political issue to cover up his administration’s failures, as well as a bargaining chip that benefits his presidential campaign.