Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1 Huang Kuo-chang not fit to run Jang Show-ling 鄭秀玲 229
2 Mother tongues are a vanguard Liou Uie-liang 劉威良 270
3 No dignity in KMT plans Taipei Times Editorial 255
4 Stand up to CCP’s intimidation Taipei Times Editorial 243
5 Existing within a fraught reality Chen Ling-yao 陳凌曜 237
6 Behind the military messaging Taipei Times Editorial 293
7 Building a secure drone supply chain Taipei Times Editorial 221
8 Opposition must work for Taiwan Michael Lin 林正二 173
9 US highlights Taiwan’s importance Taipei Times Editorial 199
10 The reality of Beijing’s rule in HK Michael Mo 巫堃泰 204
11 Fears over Taiwan as a chip risk misplaced Hsiao Hsi-huei 蕭錫惠 188
12 KMT’s ‘one China’ ambiguity Taipei Times Editorial 221
13 Tibet can only accept independence Khedroob Thondup 475
14 Lessons from the Cloudflare crash Hsiao Hsi-huei 蕭錫惠 188
15 Why embrace cynicism over hope? Lo Ming-cheng 駱明正 173
16 Tsai can enter doors closed to Lai Laura Bonsaver 163
17 KMT, TPP to blame for NCC paralysis Taipei Times Editorial 152
18 Taiwanese will not be silenced by fear Wang Hung-jen 王宏仁 189
19 The CCP’s mask slips again Taipei Times Editorial 178
20 Taiwan’s shifting optics at APEC Edwin Yang 楊聰榮 200
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Page 1 of 145

Newsflash

The WHO’s insistence on referring to Taiwan as a part of China was a slap in the face for the so-called “1992 consensus” advocated by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday.

Citing a letter sent by the WHO to the European Parliament’s Taiwan Friendship Group (TFG) that said the designation of “Taiwan, China” has been the organization’s consistent practice, DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said the letter showed there was no such thing as “one China with different interpretations,” as Ma and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have claimed the consensus entails.