Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
2041 Chameleon Ma thinks he can fool Taiwanese Chen Shan-jung 陳杉榮 600
2042 Political purging is also a disgrace Taipei Times Editorial 612
2043 The scope of the Taiwan Policy Act Frank Chiang 江永芳 690
2044 Curing democracy of its maladies Yen Chueh-an 顏厥安 703
2045 Happiness index not a true reflection Taipei Times Editorial 706
2046 Trade agreement and the Internet Liu Ching-Yi 劉靜怡 658
2047 KMT2.0 has brought back the politics of the past Chu Ping-tzu 祝平次 604
2048 Defending the use of nonviolence Chien Hsi-chie 702
2049 Government must protect farmland Du Yu 杜宇 633
2050 The misinterpretation of stability Taipei Times Editorial 736
2051 Taiwanese Spring in the making Peter Huang 黃文雄 673
2052 Defense posting shows Ma’s folly James Wang 王景弘 638
2053 White shirts protests symbol of hope Liberty Times Editorial 665
2054 The people taking back the future Liberty Times Editorial 743
2055 Spirit of Deng Nylon needs revival J. Michael Cole 寇謐將 671
2056 Take a stand against police abuse Taipei Times Editorial 639
2057 The rise of people power Taipei Times Editorial 604
2058 Hung case defines Taiwan Taipei Times Editorial 657
2059 Repressing dissent kills democracy Liu Ching-yi 劉靜怡 644
2060 Teach Taiwan history to Taiwanese Lee Hsiao-feng 李筱峰 615
 
Page 103 of 145

Newsflash

A new study published this week by Foreign Policy magazine concludes that Taiwan remains the one place in the world where China and the US “could conceivably come into direct conflict.”

Drew Thompson, director of China studies at the Nixon Center in Washington and author of the study, wrote: “Some wonder whether China and the United States are on a collision course. Unquestionably, there is deep strategic mistrust between the two countries. China’s rapid economic growth, steady military modernization and relentless nationalistic propaganda at home are shaping Chinese public expectations and limiting possibilities for compromise with other powers.”