Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1921 Preparing for a trade war in China Taipei Times Editorial 585
1922 The error of prioritizing economics over safety Lee Min-yung 李敏勇 630
1923 Inappropriate industrial environment Taipei Times Editorial 670
1924 Time to focus on people, not profits Lee Ken-cheng 李根政 747
1925 China is only holding Taiwan back Gerrit Van Der Wees 636
1926 Control Yuan reveals Ma as inept The Liberty Times Editorial 643
1927 Passing the buck on Kaohsiung blasts Taipei Times Editorial 609
1928 Eviction of pro-Beijing influence Paul Lin 林保華 609
1929 Safety of nuclear plant not guaranteed Lai Cheng-i 賴正義 634
1930 Explosions expose poor governance Taipei Times Editorial 533
1931 Beijing-Seoul FTA suits Taiwan Huang Tien-lin 黃天麟 651
1932 Control Yuan vote another hit to Ma Taipei Times Editorial 578
1933 China’s territorial claims are weak Bruce Jacobs 家博 694
1934 Candidates deserve equal standards Taipei Times Editorial 694
1935 Ma’s tactics are greatest concern The Liberty Times Editorial 771
1936 Nation’s freedom and US security Li Thian-hok 李天福 665
1937 Taxpayers paying tab for illegal hire of Kuo Huang Di-ying 黃帝穎 713
1938 Transitional justice still lacking Taipei Times Editorial 602
1939 Mao seems to have had last laugh on Chiang Taipei Times 624
1940 Taiwan and Hong Kong on similar pathways Lin Thung-hong 林宗弘 662
 
Page 97 of 145

Newsflash


Former Examination Yuan president Yao Chia-wen, center, and Taiwan Society chairman Chang Yen-hsien, right, listen as Sim Kiantek speaks yesterday at a press conference in Taipei on interpreting the Cairo Declaration.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times

President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) interpretation of the Cairo Declaration, issued on Dec. 1, 1943, as the legal basis of Taiwan’s “return” to the Republic of China (ROC) after World War II was not only incorrect, but also dangerous because his rhetoric was exactly the same as that of Beijing, pro-independence advocates said yesterday.

“[Ma’s interpretation] fits right in with the ‘one China’ framework, which would be interpreted by the international community as saying Taiwan is part of China because hardly anyone would recognize the China in ‘one China’ framework as referring to the ROC,” Taiwan Society President Chang Yen-hsien (張炎憲), a former president of the Academia Historica, told a press conference.