Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1561 KMT digs its grave on assets issue Liberty Times Editorial 816
1562 KMT still playing public for a fool Taipei Times Editorial 787
1563 DPP’s risky curricula review process Taipei Times Editorial 623
1564 Tsai’s frustrating ‘Post’ interview Taipei Times Editorial 918
1565 KMT should follow Ma Ying-jeou to Itu Aba James Wang 王景弘 622
1566 CCP’s Tom Sawyer ploy nears end Wayne Pajunen 778
1567 Artistic compromise and China Taipei Times Editorial 604
1568 Taiwan eclipses bloated monoliths William Stimson 685
1569 Beijing’s sugar-coated lies Taipei Times Editorial 634
1570 Ruling threatens Xi’s tenuous hold Paul Lin 林保華 638
1571 US planing a new East Asia pivot Parris Chang 張旭成 674
1572 KMT paves way for further isolation Taipei Times Editorial 647
1573 Tsai apology needs backing policy Guy Carlton 755
1574 Time for leader to show leadership Taipei Times Editorial 705
1575 KMT still dancing to China’s off-beat tunes Chang Kuo-tsai 張國財 633
1576 Remembering Chen Wen-chen Taipei Times Editorial 804
1577 KMT too entrenched to change Taipei Times Editorial 740
1578 Aborigines continue to be oppressed as in past Lin Yu-lun 林于倫 693
1579 Members of KMT should dismiss the whole party James Wang 王景弘 644
1580 Not by any other name Taipei Times 645
 
Page 79 of 145

Newsflash

On May 20, former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan Richard Bush and the head of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in Washington, Jason Yuan (袁健生), hosted a seminar during an academic conference to mark the centennial of the October 1911 Revolution in the Republic of China (ROC) at the Brookings Institution in the US capital.

Bush took the opportunity to remind those people in attendance that the US had broached the prickly issue of Taiwan and the Republic of China back in the 1950s and 1960s with the concepts of “New Country” (the founding of a new country) and “two Chinas.”

He then said that the concept of “two Chinas” that was proposed by the US government decades ago could still be applied to cross-strait relations today, but this would only be possible if Beijing would accept it.