Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
601 China is holding the planet hostage Chris Patten 314
602 Chinese miscalculation a real threat Taipei Times Editorial 368
603 ‘Xi thought’ shows lack of scruples The Liberty Times Editorial 355
604 Taiwan shines in anti-graft index Hsu Jen-hui 徐仁輝 309
605 Ending national defense corruption Taipei Times Editorial 347
606 Bold leadership for Uighur people Kok Bayraq 320
607 Stop wasting words, take action Tzou Jiing-wen 鄒景雯 346
608 NTHU shows enemy inside the gate The Liberty Times Editorial 351
609 Healthcare workers denied fair pay Ben Goren 343
610 Europe seems to have had enough Manik Mehta 477
611 US should pledge to defend Taiwan Joseph Bosco 337
612 Failures led to PRC-linked unit at NTHU Chin Heng-wei 金恆煒 334
613 Checking education ties with China Taipei Times Editorial 404
614 Referendum items are a KMT stunt The Liberty Times Editorial 285
615 US summit should invite Taiwan Huynh Tam Sang, Phan Van Tim 352
616 Mayor Ko Wen-je’s IQ debacle Taipei Times Editorial 275
617 KMT, TPP confused on pork issue Huang Wei-ping 黃惟冰 297
618 Rethinking the Sunflower movement Huang Yu-zhe and Lee Ming-ju 黃于哲 李明洳 268
619 Tsai must put nation on war footing Mark Rawson 303
620 Pork referendum set to serve CCP Chuang Sheng-rong 莊勝榮 296
 
Page 31 of 145

Newsflash

Former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) chairman Richard Bush yesterday expressed concern about whether Taiwan’s democratic system, which he said is “polarized” and “divided,” could withstand Beijing’s efforts to bring about unification.

Before wrapping up his short visit to Taipei, Bush remarked on the state of cross-strait relations and Taiwan’s democratic system during a roundtable discussion at a symposium entitled “A Spectacular Century: The Republic of China (ROC) Centennial Democracy Forums.”

In his speech, Bush discussed how the development of cross-strait relations might have constrained the choices available to Taiwan’s political system, examining how changes to the balance of power might have impacted Taiwan’s democracy.