Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
2621 Is an ECFA beneficial to Taiwan … or the US? Nat Bellocchi 995
2622 KMT proposal reeks of censorship Taipei Times Editorial 924
2623 That’s how Su Chi ‘resurfaces’? Taipei Times Editorial 1067
2624 NHI reform misses the point Taipei Times Editorial 973
2625 Beijing’s intentions for ECFA very clear James Wang 王景弘 987
2626 Experts vs the people: democracy in jeopardy Hsu Shih-jung 徐世榮 908
2627 ECFA requires more than ‘belief’ Taipei Times Editorial 977
2628 China rolls out sticks and carrots Paul Lin 林保華 901
2629 China shows signs of neo-fascism J. Michael Cole 寇謐將 1115
2630 Is HK democracy to be feared? Taipei Times Editorial 871
2631 It’s not Ma’s words, it’s his deeds Taipei Times Editorial 1056
2632 The real cause of the 228 Incident Lee Hsiao-feng 李筱峰 1553
2633 Taiwan can’t afford to be silent Taipei Times Editorial 1096
2634 KMT’s woes can be laid at feet of Ma, King Lu I-ming 呂一銘 989
2635 KMT’s paternalism is self-defeating Taipei Times Editorial 1224
2636 China is Ma’s ‘opiate of the masses’ Liberty Times Editorial 1428
2637 Are we on the brink of a new 228? Lin Yun-mei 林詠梅 2116
2638 Where are the jobs? Taipei Times Editorial 1396
2639 Where do Ma’s loyalties lie? Taipei Times Editorial 1217
2640 Without birds, arms sales is theater Taipei Times Editorial 1136
 
Page 132 of 145

Newsflash

Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have proposed revising military laws to stipulate that any active-duty military personnel who express allegiance to the enemy could face two to seven years in prison, adding that soldiers’ loyalty to the nation means “no freedom of expression.”

In the past few years some military personnel have pledged allegiance to China through videos and documents, but it is not punishable under the law.

In its draft amendment to Article 24 of the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces (陸海空軍刑法), the Ministry of National Defense proposed only making actions that “harm the military’s interests” punishable, citing freedom of speech in its reasoning for the draft amendment.