Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1241 Surrender, opposition to US are silly ideas James Wang 王景弘 580
1242 NTU ethics case requires clarity Bih Herng-dar 畢恆達 593
1243 Transitional justice on the horizon Taipei Times Editorial 836
1244 Trade war looming over Taiwan Parris Chang 張旭成 588
1245 Kuan owes public an explanation Huang Tien-lin 黃天麟 779
1246 China not the only option for Taiwanese Lau Yi-te 劉一德 770
1247 Defense against PRC’s 31 incentives Huang Tien-lin 黃天麟 587
1248 No global place for an Emperor Xi Parris Chang 張旭成 679
1249 Taiwan in need of US-like security clearances Huang Tien-lin 黃天麟 806
1250 HK following in Taiwan’s footsteps Joseph Tse-hei Lee 李榭熙 825
1251 Initiatives cannot fool Taiwanese Taipei Times Editorial 861
1252 West should forget about China, focus on Taiwan Gerrit van der Wees 784
1253 Taiwanese will not sell out to China that easily Lee Min-yung 李敏勇 834
1254 Was restarting reactor a last resort? Taipei Times Editorial 732
1255 Justice demands data preservation Yeh Hung-ling 葉虹靈 890
1256 President-for-life Xi and Taiwan Taipei Times Editorial 674
1257 Working together to find the truth Taipei Times Editorial 810
1258 Police must adapt to era of ‘critical citizens’ Lin Chia-ho 林佳和 848
1259 Taiwan’s geopolitical importance Parris Chang 張旭成 618
1260 Beijing trying to buy Taiwanese Liberty Times Editorial 831
 
Page 63 of 143

Newsflash

President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) proposal for a possible peace accord with China within a 10-year time frame could put Taiwan’s sovereignty and democratic values at risk and leave future generations with no freedom of choice, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said yesterday.

Speaking as the head of her party, Tsai, the DPP’s presidential candidate in January’s election, told a press conference that Ma’s proposal was “irresponsible and impetuous” and that it amounted to the manipulation of a highly sensitive political issue to cover up his administration’s failures, as well as a bargaining chip that benefits his presidential campaign.