Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
441 US ‘denial strategy’ to help Taiwan Tommy Lin 林逸民 552
442 Reading between Biden’s lines Taipei Times Editorials 369
443 Pledge shows where loyalties lie Taipei Times Editorials 455
444 Campaigning in the age of plagiarism Taipei Times Editorials 457
445 Kissinger’s China policy mistakes Joseph Bosco 537
446 Taiwanese must fight for support Stanley Kao 高碩泰 424
447 Diluted agreement appeases China Taipei Times Editorials 480
448 Realizing a ‘Taiwanese standpoint’ Lee Min-yung 李敏勇 433
449 Speech hypocrisy in CTiTV lawsuit Taipei Times Editorials 379
450 China’s phony war against Taiwan and its real intention Miles Yu 453
451 Sacrifices of overseas Taiwanese pay off Paul Li 李壬癸 426
452 Make Taiwan a tough nut to crack Taipei Times Editorials 478
453 Underreaction to Chinese threat Huang Yu-hsiu 黃郁琇 465
454 Chips give Taiwan an edge that it needs to use Yang Chung-yueh 楊宗岳 434
455 Combat China through India ties P.R. Shankar 529
456 Dogmatism breeds plagiarism Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 431
457 Experience ties Taiwan, Baltic states together Hsu Meng-wei 許孟瑋 518
458 Hsia’s feeble objections to China Lin Han 林志翰 434
459 Voiceless Uighurs need more truth tellers Rebiya Kadeer and Kok Bayraq 505
460 Exposing China’s lies on Taiwan Sim Kiantek 沈建德 673
 
Page 23 of 145

Newsflash

On May 20, former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan Richard Bush and the head of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in Washington, Jason Yuan (袁健生), hosted a seminar during an academic conference to mark the centennial of the October 1911 Revolution in the Republic of China (ROC) at the Brookings Institution in the US capital.

Bush took the opportunity to remind those people in attendance that the US had broached the prickly issue of Taiwan and the Republic of China back in the 1950s and 1960s with the concepts of “New Country” (the founding of a new country) and “two Chinas.”

He then said that the concept of “two Chinas” that was proposed by the US government decades ago could still be applied to cross-strait relations today, but this would only be possible if Beijing would accept it.