Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home The News News No need for loyalty exemptions: Lai

No need for loyalty exemptions: Lai

There is no need to amend the law to exempt Chinese spouses from single allegiance to the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday, adding that such changes would only increase the public’s doubts toward new residents from China and would not improve social harmony.

Taiwan is a democratic, diverse and free country, he said.

“No matter which ethnic group you belong to, where you come from or when you arrive, as long as you identify with Taiwan, you are masters of this country,” he said.

President William gives a speech at an event in Tainan yesterday.

Photo: screen grab from the Presidential Office’s Flickr page

Taiwan is a democratic nation that follows the rule of law, where immigrants are all equally protected by the law, he said, adding that those who contravene the rules must be dealt with according to the law.

“This has nothing to do with ethnicity or identity. Before the law, everyone is equal,” he said.

Nationality Act (國籍法) amendments are unnecessary and redundant, Lai said.

There is no need to revise the act to specially exempt immigrants from China from pledging singular loyalty to the ROC, he said, adding that the move would not be beneficial to immigrants and could increase social concerns, undermining social harmony.

“Don’t love in a way that leads to harm,” Lai said, urging legislators to think twice about revising the law and to work together to safeguard national security, promote unity and focus on making Taiwan more progressive.

Lai also expressed his gratitude for the efforts and contributions of the hundreds of thousands of immigrants in Taiwan.

There are countless heartwarming stories of immigrants integrating into Taiwanese society, Lai said.

He cited as an example South Korean YouTuber Kim Jin-young, better known by her handle “ggu_Kim,” who recently obtained her residency status and used the NT$10,000 cash handout she received from the government to pay for a large billboard in South Korea promoting Taiwan as a travel destination.

Another example is Larisa Bakurova, a gymnastics champion from Ukraine, who, after marrying a Taiwanese, fully dedicated herself to her profession and trained young Taiwanese athletes to shine on the international stage, Lai said.

He also mentioned Chinese spouse Qiu Qiaozhu (邱巧珠) from Fujian, who married into a family in Yunlin County and joined her husband’s family egg wholesale business.

She has not forgotten to give back to the community and is helping the disadvantaged, Lai said.

In related news, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) proposed amendment to the Nationality Act, led by caucus whip Fu Kun-chi’s, was yesterday referred to the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee for review.

The proposed amendment follows several recent cases in which Chinese spouse of Taiwanese nationals were removed from office after failing  to provide proof that they had relinquished their People's Republic of China (PRC) nationality.

The draft amendment to the Nationality Act stipulates that the political rights of residents from China should  be governed by the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例)

Under this framework, Chinese spouses who have  household registration in Taiwan would no longer be  subject to Article 20 of the Nationality Act.

Article 20 requires ROC nationals  who hold a foreign nationality to renounce it within one  year of assuming public positions, with failure to comply  resulting in removal from office.

According to the bill's explanatory note, the Nationality  Act currently governs only the acquisition, loss, restoration,  and revocation of ROC nationality, and does not clearly  define its applicability to mainland Chinese residents.

In practice, this has created confusion between Article  20's renunciation requirement and the provisions of the cross-strait relations act, undermining legal clarity and predictability, according to the bill's authors.

It is believed to be impossible for China-born spouses  to provide proof they had renounced their Chinese  citizenship because Beijing does not issue the necessary  documents since it considers Taiwan as a part of China and  its residents as its own citizens.

Under PRC law, Chinese nationals who have settled  abroad and been naturalized as a foreign national "shall" automatically lose Chinese nationality.

The KMT argues that Chinese spouses' political rights  should be evaluated under the cross-strait relations act, which already provides a distinct framework for household  registration, employment, and eligibility to stand for election -- and that this special law should take precedence  to avoid misapplication of the Nationality Act.

Fu's proposed amendment was placed on yesterday's plenary agenda  by the Legislature's Procedure Committee. As no objections  were raised during the reading of reports, the bill was  referred to committee for further deliberation.

The committee is slated to hold a public hearing next week on the amendment, at which they would discuss other countries’ regulations on naturalized citizens or dual nationals holding public office; whether the current rules on foreign nationals, naturalized citizens or dual nationals holding public office are appropriate; and other legislative recommendations for amending the Nationality Act.

Additional reporting by CNA, Liu Wan-lin and Chen Cheng- yu


Source: Taipei Times - 2025/11/29



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Facebook! Twitter!  
 

Newsflash

Anyone who cares about law and government has to be impressed by visiting Taiwan. Its democratically elected president and legislature, spurred by the interpretations of its independent Constitutional Court, have just ended the power of the police to imprison people without affording them the full protections of the newly revised judicial process.