Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Editorials of Interest Taipei Times Democracy and Taiwan’s identity

Democracy and Taiwan’s identity

E-mail Print PDF

In less than a month, Taiwanese are to head to the polls to democratically elect both a new president and new members of the Legislative Yuan. As they prepare to make the important choice of who is to rule their nation over the next four years, there are questions they must ask. What makes their nation a nation? What brings the people together?

The concepts of nationhood and national identity in today’s world have been strongly influenced by the writings of Benedict Anderson, a historian who was born in 1936 in Kunming, China, and this month passed away in Batu, Indonesia. Anderson’s most popular and widely read book, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, introduced that very phrase — “imagined communities” — to explain how citizens can jointly forge and socially construct communities even though they might never actually meet most community members in their day-to-day lives.

For Taiwanese, Anderson’s words are to the point. Their challenge is to establish a national identity from the diverse historical background of their members. Many of these citizens have links back to the Japanese colonial era and have a totally different history from those that came after the Chinese Civil War.

Yet, somewhere in this past diversity, in addition to their different experiences in suffering through the Martial Law and White Terror eras, they must find a shared uniqueness for an imagined community. That shared uniqueness can be found in their recent democracy, when the pubic began to elect Taiwan’s legislature in 1992 and president in 1996.

In democratic experience, Taiwanese are not the first. They can look to the US, which had its own experience with democracy, although on a larger scale.

Initially, a majority of Americans came from English colonies and shared common European cultural roots and values going back as far as the early Greek and Roman empires. However, they soon had to incorporate new waves of immigration with ethnic roots different than those of Europe; they had to put aside being British or European — or whatever else — to be American.

This experience had to be expanded to eventually take in all races, creeds and colors, where the national identity would always be grounded in a democratic community, a community where all would merge in a metaphoric melting pot or, better yet, a vegetable stew.

For Anderson, a different key modern factor that has contributed to shaping the image of a nation has been that of the media, which, by being able to reach the masses, played a separate role in defining a modern nation and identity.

However, with democracies, it is not just important to have media, but to have free media, along with governmental transparency that allows the media to report on those who rule. Such free media demand the examination and questioning of elected rulers. Taiwanese can contrast with the one-party state on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.

Ironically, there remain a few in Taiwan that still seem to long for a regressive return to that non-democratic one-party state in China. In exploring the motivation for this return, these few must anticipate that, in China, they would have the privilege of being at the top of the food chain of that one-party state, as they were once atop the food chain in Taiwan’s one-party state. They would never want to join the masses of poor in the lower echelons.

There is a double irony here: These regressive few lost the Chinese Civil War, but they still feel they deserve to enter the privileged ranks of the winners of that conflict.

Another separate factor that Taiwanese must explore and be aware of is the reality of their nation’s size in contrast with other countries. Most people in Taiwan and the world do not realize that their imagined community encompasses a mid-sized democratic nation. In population, it is larger than about 75 percent of the world’s nations, and in GDP and economic trading power it ranks in the top 75th to 80th percentile.

In both population and in GDP purchasing power parity, Taiwan and Australia are nearly equal. This is to the point. It would be absurd for any outsiders to even think of trying to pressure the imagined community of a country like Australia to give in to the whims of a larger country such as China, yet those same outsiders have little hesitation in wanting to pressure Taiwan’s imagined community to kowtow to China’s demands.

All these are factors make this election important to Taiwanese, as they seek to both choose their leaders and to hold on to their sense of identity.

A final factor that Anderson found in the emergence of modern nations is that of the dismantling of hierarchies. In the Western world, this can be seen, for example, in surrendering the divine right of kings that led to democracies and republics. As China does not have a democracy and free press, the people there still do not realize that their hierarchies have not been dismantled.

True, the dynastic rulers of the Qing Dynasty have been overthrown, but after a long period of warlords and then a civil war between two Leninist parties, China is still under the rule of the hierarchy of a one-party state. However, this time it is now run by privileged oligarchs instead of a royal family. As one author put it, the “Bling Dynasty” has simply replaced the Qing Dynasty.

For Taiwan, the role of democracy is crucial to the identity of its imagined community. Members can argue over its origins and who gets credit for their hard-won democracy, but they all have to respect it.

The imagined community of Taiwan’s democracy does not include China. A few Taiwanese might have a pipe dream of somehow regaining the borders of China, but it is unlikely Taiwanese would want to go and die to defend those borders if China again went to war with India or Vietnam.

Similarly, Taiwanese might sympathize, but they do not have a mental affinity with those in Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong or even Beijing. The affinity and imagined community that Taiwanese have is for those within the borders of Taiwan, who share the right to determine who is to lead their imagined community.

Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.

Source: Taipei Times - Editorials 2015/12/21

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Facebook! Twitter!  


A pro-independence group said yesterday it had invited Uighur leader Rebiya Kadeer to visit Taiwan after a previous trip was banned by the government because of concerns that it would provoke Beijing.

Freddy Lim (林昶佐), head of Guts United Taiwan, extended the invitation when he met Kadeer in Washington on Wednesday, the group said in a statement.