Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Activity Slideshow

Activity Slideshow


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
311 2018-10-09 Tati(Daixde) Hall Sep 1st Ritual Prayer Nationwide for Peace and Blessings Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 541
312 2018-10-06 Holy Mountain - Volunteering Fulfilling Wishes Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 441
313 2018-09-29 Holy Mountain - Volunteering Fulfilling Wishes Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 460
314 2018-09-26 Tati Affinity Group Activity - Visit Tsan-zuo(贊坐) Practitioner Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 503
315 2018-09-24 Tati(Daixde) Hall Aug 15th Ritual Prayer Nationwide for Peace and Blessings Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 575
316 2018-09-22 Holy Mountain - Mid-Autumn Festival & Volunteering Fulfilling Wishes Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 453
317 2018-09-22 The Son of Iron Bull, Taiwan Ashin - Prof. Hsu Chun-hsin Book Signing Nationwide Announcement at Taichung Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 564
318 2018-09-15 Holy Mountain - Volunteering Fulfilling Wishes & Visit Tsan-ta(贊塔) Practitioner Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 682
319 2018-09-11 Holy Mountain - Taiwan Ancestor Temple Ritual Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 629
320 2018-09-10 Tati(Daixde) Hall Aug 1st Ritual Prayer Nationwide for Peace and Blessings Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 534
 
Page 32 of 228

Newsflash

The WHO’s insistence on referring to Taiwan as a part of China was a slap in the face for the so-called “1992 consensus” advocated by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday.

Citing a letter sent by the WHO to the European Parliament’s Taiwan Friendship Group (TFG) that said the designation of “Taiwan, China” has been the organization’s consistent practice, DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said the letter showed there was no such thing as “one China with different interpretations,” as Ma and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have claimed the consensus entails.