Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home The News News Penghu residents say authorities threatened them

Penghu residents say authorities threatened them

E-mail Print PDF

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and several Penghu residents yesterday accused the government and judicial authorities of threatening the island’s voters to deter them from casting ballots in the Dec. 5 local elections.

At a press conference at the Legislative Yuan, several registered Penghu voters living in Taiwan proper showed a letter issued jointly by the Penghu Prosecutors’ Office, the Penghu County Police Department and the Investigation Bureau’s Penghu office advising them not to vote in the local elections if they have a household registration in Penghu but do not live in the county normally.

Officially, Penghu has a population of more than 90,000, but only just more than 50,000 people permanently live in the county. The letter was sent to around 400 Penghu residents who do not live there permanently but had recently moved their household registration back to Penghu County.

The letter states that moving one’s household registration to Penghu only to vote for a certain candidate is in violation of the Election and Recall Act of Public Servants (公職人員選舉罷免法) and is punishable by a jail term of up to five years.

“If you are involved in the situation mentioned above, please move your household registration away from Penghu or do not vote in the election, and you should be fine,” the letter said.

“What kind of country is this? What kind of government is this?” A registered Penghu voter who lives and works in Taipei asked at the press conference. “Who dares to go home after something like this?”

DPP spokesman Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) said he suspected the letter was targeted against the DPP’s call for all Penghu residents to go home to vote on Dec. 5.

“The DPP supports prosecution of ‘phantom voters,’ but does not agree with the decision to send out such a letter, because it blocks people’s right to vote,” Tsai said. “We strongly condemn the move.”

Another Penghu resident, Yen Chiang-lung (顏江龍), who did not receive the letter, also condemned the letter.

“The judiciary should never send such a letter to voters unless they have solid evidence that these people are phantom voters — and I believe the majority of the 400 people who received the letter did not move their household registration back to Penghu with illegal intentions,” Yen said. “But this letter may scare them into not voting.”

In response, Penghu Chief Prosecutor Chu Kun-mao (朱坤茂) said the letter was only a “friendly reminder” with no intention to threaten anyone or target any particular political party or candidate.

Source: Taipei Times 2009/11/24



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Facebook! Twitter!  
 

Newsflash


Academia Sinica research fellow Wu Nai-teh yesterday speaks at a forum in Taipei on transitional justice and law organized by the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times

At a time when “transitional justice” is on everyone’s lips, Taiwan faces the questions of not only how it should be achieved, but also how “historical truth” should be received, academics said in Taipei yesterday.