Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1821 Chen release a step to reconciliation Taipei Times Editorial 536
1822 Government must listen to people Taipei Times Editorial 566
1823 Ko emerges as possible leader for diplomacy HoonTing 雲程 524
1824 KMT needs to change its mindset Taipei Times Editorial 590
1825 Breaking through the ‘party-state’ democracy Chung Ming-Lun 鍾明倫 518
1826 KMT defeat a new start for Taiwan democracy Chiu Hei-yuan 瞿海源 518
1827 Taiwanese compatriots include the ill and poor Mayo Kuo 郭明裕 550
1828 Taipei can break free from the KMT today Lee Min-yung 李敏勇 545
1829 Reliance on China is a hindrance to free trade Gerrit Van Der Wees 518
1830 The appeals of Lien the lachrymose Taipei Times Editorial 550
1831 Democracy more than just a ballot Taipei Times Editorial 519
1832 Elections need to be less about good looks Chang Shyue-yih 張學逸 501
1833 Organ smears are a disservice to all Taipei Times Editorial 559
1834 Lien Chan reveals hatred, ignorance Taipei Times Editorial 633
1835 Hubristic, self-entitled KMT must be voted out Lee Min-yung 李敏勇 587
1836 Ma, China unite against independence Taipei Times Editorial 530
1837 Sensing the good within the KMT Paul Lin 林保華 603
1838 Canadian lessons on Chinese links Robert Henderson 640
1839 KMT lost without DPP opposition Taipei Times Editorial 574
1840 KMT refuses transitional justice Huang Chang-ling, Yeh Hung-ling 黃長玲﹐葉虹靈 576
 
Page 92 of 143

Newsflash

People in favor of nuclear power often condescend to supporters of the anti-nuclear movement, saying: “You do not know what you’re talking about, you are not scientists, yours is an irrational fear.” By this, they mean that “you don’t have a background in nuclear power engineering, you don’t understand anything about nuclear power plants, so you are not qualified to have a say in the debate about nuclear safety.”

However, who is most qualified to talk about nuclear safety? Is it the nuclear power engineers? Are they really the highest authority on the dangers of nuclear power?