Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
881 Decisive action on corruption needed Taipei Times Editorial 405
882 A Xinjiang militia guards Xi’s empire Taipei Times Editorial 398
883 In remembrance of Lee Teng-hui Peng Ming-min 彭明敏 405
884 The benefits of a Dalai Lama visit Khedroob Thondup 444
885 Benefiting from ‘trusted 5G’ status Taipei Times Editorial 416
886 Time for US carriers in the Strait Joseph Bosco 520
887 Pompeo raises alarm on Xi’s China Joseph Bosco 451
888 India must counter China in Tibet Dolma Tsering 407
889 China strategy options for the US Joseph Bosco 483
890 Beijing’s broken promises matter Clifton Yin 尹立崇 408
891 Global effort to counter HK law Liberty Times Editorial 450
892 US hammer finds nail in HK banks Taipei Times Editorial 440
893 Taiwan and the EU’s ‘safe list’ Ian Inkster 音雅恩 467
894 Preparing for what comes next Taipei Times 462
895 Stephen M. Young On Taiwan: Beijing’s disturbing new turn Stephen M. Young 435
896 No need to panic over Bolton book Chen Kuan-fu 陳冠甫 442
897 Punish traffickers, help victims Taipei Times Editorial 438
898 Diaoyutais dispute pleases China Liberty Times Editorial 436
899 New constitution must drop ‘China’ Huang Jei-hsuan 404
900 The case against political fandom Taipei Times Editorial 465
 
Page 45 of 145

Newsflash


Former Examination Yuan president Yao Chia-wen, center, and Taiwan Society chairman Chang Yen-hsien, right, listen as Sim Kiantek speaks yesterday at a press conference in Taipei on interpreting the Cairo Declaration.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times

President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) interpretation of the Cairo Declaration, issued on Dec. 1, 1943, as the legal basis of Taiwan’s “return” to the Republic of China (ROC) after World War II was not only incorrect, but also dangerous because his rhetoric was exactly the same as that of Beijing, pro-independence advocates said yesterday.

“[Ma’s interpretation] fits right in with the ‘one China’ framework, which would be interpreted by the international community as saying Taiwan is part of China because hardly anyone would recognize the China in ‘one China’ framework as referring to the ROC,” Taiwan Society President Chang Yen-hsien (張炎憲), a former president of the Academia Historica, told a press conference.