Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1981 No response to Ma’s unmet promises Taipei Times Editorial 589
1982 Allow youth freedom of expression Taipei Times Editorial 609
1983 Take guard against fake liberalization Liu Ching-yi 劉靜怡 572
1984 Capitalist scheme hurts the nation Liao Pen-chuan 廖本全 603
1985 Ma’s focus on Xi, not constituency Taipei Times Editorial 569
1986 Policy creates mistress economy Huang Tien-lin 黃天麟 616
1987 President Ma is not the only problem Michael Danielsen 638
1988 US needs to keep China in check Paul Lin 林保華 575
1989 ‘Island’ ads part of unification push Taipei Times Editorial 583
1990 Ma must uphold human rights pledge Taipei Times Editorial 574
1991 KMT serves to obscure national sovereignty Wei Hung-wu 韋洪武 545
1992 Declaration lacks legal power Coen Blaauw 622
1993 Taiwan’s sovereignty challenged by Beijing Nat Bellocchi 白樂崎 588
1994 Ma wimps out over defense zone Taipei Times Editorial 634
1995 Fukushima disaster is warning to world, TEPCO boss says Simon Tisdall / The Guardian, TOKYO 609
1996 Censoring ‘Death of a Buddha’ Taipei Times Editorial 659
1997 KMT charter now anti-democratic Frank Hsieh 謝長廷 789
1998 Preserving the values of democracy Huang Cheng-yi 黃丞儀 615
1999 Taiwan losing patience with Ma, KMT Taipei Times Editorial 538
2000 Strong chain to contain dictatorship Wilson Chen 陳破空 609
 
Page 100 of 145

Newsflash

Defying the executive branch once again, the legislative caucuses of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on Tuesday reached a consensus to ban “risky” beef products, including bone-in beef, offal and ground beef, from areas where cases of mad cow disease have been documented in the past 10 years.

This outcome is a stern rebuke for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, which in October said it would relax restrictions on beef imports — but without any political preparation. Not only was there no prior consultation with local health experts, but it was also in blatant defiance of a legislative resolution from 2006 that requires the Department of Health to submit a detailed report to the legislature before lifting bans on US beef.