Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1601 The DPP gives lesson in democracy Taipei Times Editorial 528
1602 Tsai needs to exploit diplomatic window Keng Kim-yung 何景榮 568
1603 From ROC ashes, Taiwan can rise Michael Hsiao 蕭新煌 579
1604 New status for today’s Taiwan is self-identity James Wang 王景弘 549
1605 No normality without left and right Lee Min-yung 李敏勇 542
1606 Beijing’s backfiring Huang debacle Taipei Times Editorial 572
1607 Synchronized elections fuel gap issue Taipei Times Editorial 562
1608 Flush away the “1992 consensus” Taipei Times Editorial 540
1609 Tsai faces tough task to achieve true reform Peng Ming-min 彭明敏 547
1610 A historic day for politics in Taiwan Taipei Times Editorial 577
1611 Voters reject KMT fear-mongering Taipei Times Editorial 722
1612 The KMT’s allergy to democracy Taipei Times Editorial 901
1613 Young people must not waste vote Taipei Times Editorial 537
1614 Beijing uses Hong Kong strategy Liberty Times Editorial 567
1615 KMT is like a vampire under the rising sun James Wang 王景弘 548
1616 The past should not be forgotten Taipei Times Editorial 588
1617 Voters can choose a brighter future Liberty Times Editorial 565
1618 KMT’s Chu shown to be empty Taipei Times Editorial 616
1619 US model of transition an example to Taiwan Christian Fan Jiang 范姜提昂 646
1620 KMT still has a talent for great mendacity James Wang 王景弘 547
 
Page 81 of 143

Newsflash

Opposition parties yesterday vowed to begin a “10-year resistance” against the government’s plan to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, including organizing large-scale protests calling for a referendum on the controversial pact.

The Executive Yuan’s Referendum Review Committee on Thursday night voted 12-4 against an opposition-supported referendum proposal asking voters whether they agreed that the government should sign an ECFA with China. The committee said the question did not fall under what was allowed under the Referendum Act (公民投票法).