Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
161 Reject ‘consensus,’ vote for peace Taipei Times Editorial 157
162 Taiwan’s Constitution and America’s ‘One China’ Policy John J. Tkacik, Jr. 199
163 Hou parrots the CCP, deep-blue line Jethro Wang 王濬 181
164 Abe’s Taiwan statement is a myth Masahiro Matsumura 184
165 Miners’ families need a resolution Taipei Times Editorial 171
166 Overview of the presidential debate Taipei Times Editorial 159
167 China trade report just another bully’s tool Yen Huai-shing 顏慧欣 170
168 Being pro-China will save no one Roger Wu 吳哲文 183
169 Ancient texts unrelated to morality Taipei Times Editorial 199
170 Education with no indoctrination Chen Chi-nung 陳啟濃 157
171 Curriculum changes appropriate Linus Chiou 邱士哲 180
172 Deepfakes pose risk for the election Weber Lai 賴祥蔚 172
173 Nothing is deep-green about Ko Lai Yen-cheng 賴彥丞 177
174 Countering CCP cognitive warfare Taipei Times Editorial 212
175 Young voters must learn to discern Yang Tsung-li楊宗澧 161
176 Independence is already ‘status quo’ Taipei Times 159
177 KMT miscalculates again Taipei Times Editorial 187
178 Lessons for Taiwan: Israeli Social Resilience During War Guermantes Lailari 152
179 Jaw and Wu could be liabilities Taipei Times Editorial 167
180 Fight with ballots, not bullets Lee Hsiao-feng 李筱峰 213
 
Page 9 of 143

Newsflash

Chen Chih-chung (陳致中), son of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who was stripped of his Greater Kaohsiung councilor position after being found guilty of perjury, said yesterday the court’s sentence amounted to political persecution.

The younger Chen lost his job after the Supreme Court on Wednesday sentenced him to three months in jail for perjury in a case related to his father’s state affairs fund case.

Chen Chih-chung issued a statement saying he could not accept the sentence and he did not believe those who voted for him would accept it either, because the public could not allow political vendettas to be carried out “to such an extent.”