Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1001 Taiwanese confidence, values key to tourism Lin Cheng-you 林琤祐 432
1002 Making Taiwanese count in the US Taipei Times Editorial 483
1003 HK protest tactics may be needed in Taiwan Paul Lin 林保華 464
1004 With China, let Trump be Reagan Joseph Bosco 471
1005 Taiwan is drowning in a flood of falsehoods Janet Hung 洪湘斐 473
1006 Tea controversy hits boiling point Taipei Times Editorial 445
1007 Withering US strategic ambiguity Bill Sharp 478
1008 Beijing’s travel ban has other motives Honda Chen 陳鴻達 514
1009 Registering foreign agents needed Ho Cheng-hui 何澄輝 503
1010 US could learn from Hong Kongers Joseph Bosco 404
1011 Scandal casts shadow over NSB Taipei Times 411
1012 Significance of Tsai’s US activities Michael Lin 林正二 414
1013 US-China ties and Taiwan safety Tu Ho-ting 杜和庭 430
1014 Reviving English-language policy Taipei Times Editorial 442
1015 Strides in human rights diplomacy Taipei Times Editorial 447
1016 KMT’s China talks must be probed Taipei Times Editorial 442
1017 Official should be sacked over false report Ling Po-chih 凌博志 468
1018 China missile test destroys trust Taipei Times Editorial 452
1019 China as an alternative model? Sushil Seth 452
1020 Taiwan is a true transnational state David Pendery 潘大為 567
 
Page 51 of 144

Newsflash


From left, Animal Protection Administration Oversight Committee convener Wang Wei-chi, Taiwan Alliance for Animal Rights Policy executive director Ho Tsung-hsun, Aletheia University associate professor of law Wu Ching-chin and Negative Vote Association president Sam Chang express concerns over proposed changes to the Referendum Act at a news conference in Taipei yesterday.
Photo: Chu Pei-hsiung, Taipei Times

A coalition of civil groups yesterday expressed concern that the Central Election Commission’s proposed changes to the Referendum Act (公民投票法) could restrict people’s rights and result in “a step backward for democracy.”