Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Taipei Times


Title Filter     Display # 
# Article Title Author Hits
1601 Lame-duck Ma could be a threat to the nation Chen Mao-hsiung 陳茂雄 428
1602 Supporting the right to freedom of choice Stephen Hsu 許全義 501
1603 Becoming ‘Chinese’ no help for HTC sales Huang Tien-lin 黃天麟 466
1604 Doubts over Chinese entry permits Taipei Times Editorial 469
1605 Unification through a change of identity Christian Fan Jiang 范姜提昂 472
1606 Vote against China-or vote for it Taiwan Tati Cultural & Educational Foundation 473
1607 Democracy, freedom can help nation lead region Ho Hsin-chuan 何信全 483
1608 MOE dislikes independent thinking Taipei Times Editorial 498
1609 Bullying and cheap tricks to trap Tsai James Wang 王景弘 476
1610 A vicious distortion of Taiwan’s history James Wang 王景弘 462
1611 Ma arranges US cleanup after Tsai Taipei Times Editorial 457
1612 KMT’s grip unlikely to survive our new times James Wang 王景弘 684
1613 The path to happiness is not gold Wu Hui-lin 吳惠林 472
1614 Hong Kong is Taiwan’s nightmare Taipei Times Editorial 480
1615 Firm basis for cross-strait relations Gerrit Van Der Wees 480
1616 Taiwan’s struggle to be recognized Lin Shih-chia 林世嘉 490
1617 Ma’s promises nothing but jokes Huang Kuo-chang 黃國昌 498
1618 The ghosts of imperial China sap Taiwanese Lee Min-yung 李敏勇 488
1619 Money woes likely to end KMT run The Liberty Times Editorial 551
1620 The ‘1992 consensus’ never had significance Chang Bao-yuan 張葆源 469
 
Page 81 of 138

Newsflash


Students outside the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday hold up cardboard signs calling for the passage of oversight legislation prior to a review of the cross-strait service trade agreement, as police clear the way for legislators and staff vehicles to enter and leave the complex.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times

Student activists occupying the legislative chamber yesterday rejected the Cabinet’s proposal for legislation to monitor cross-strait agreements, calling it an empty, insincere proposal aimed at deceiving the public.

“The Cabinet proposal is rather superficial, especially when [the premier] rejects our demand to apply the law to the review of the cross-strait service trade agreement,” student leader Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷) told a news conference at the Legislative Yuan.