Taiwan Tati Cultural and Educational Foundation

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Editorials of Interest Taipei Times The Control Yuan and scapegoating

The Control Yuan and scapegoating

For obvious reasons, all eyes have been on the Control Yuan’s review of the government’s response to Typhoon Morakot. Soon after the typhoon hit Taiwan and the devastation in the south became apparent, Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) reacted to the government’s incompetent response with the classic line: “I was so angry that I wanted to scold and kill people, but I didn’t know who to blame.”

President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did, however. His first public criticism was directed at the Central Weather Bureau (CWB). Someone or something had to be immediately accountable, and the easiest target was a bunch of civil-service meteorologists with no opportunity to defend their organization or their individual professionalism.

Wang, meanwhile, was able to compose himself and be more specific: “The Control Yuan will impeach the heads of government institutions who failed to improve the problems highlighted by the Control Yuan’s corrective measures.”

And this: “The Control Yuan is entitled to impeach heads of government agencies repeatedly until they step down, and to keep impeaching their successors until problems are resolved.”

Fine words, but judging from the Control Yuan report on the CWB’s handling of Morakot this week, it is not certain that those who acted negligently or incompetently will be identified. Worse, it is possible that scapegoating will be an acceptable substitute.

Try as it might, the Control Yuan report made no meaningful comment on professional aspects of weather forecasting — in particular, how to determine the volume of rainfall likely to hit specific locations that might lead to fatalities. The CWB cannot be held to account for natural phenomena for which no scientific technique offers reliable predictive assistance. Besides, the CWB is made up of meteorologists, not geologists — and certainly not soothsayers.

The Control Yuan’s corrective measures in some cases were laughable, including the quaint idea of a drain-cleaning reminder service for those who need such advice. Clearly, its investigators must adopt a more intelligent approach.

At a press conference on Wednesday, Control Yuan member Cheng Jen-hung (程仁宏) actually offered praise to CWB staff for their meteorological aptitude, but said they have poor public relations skills.

Cheng, who rode into the Control Yuan on the back of his leadership of the Consumers’ Foundation — a media-savvy organization that conducts unscientific “surveys” of consumer products and issues doom-ridden press releases — has, for one, carried over his hobby-horse approach to government accountability by focusing on insubstantial matters. No one should be surprised by this; Cheng, after all, once warned that the High Speed Rail was at risk of derailing, but we still don’t know why.

If an official culture of excessive blame and activist meddling continues, what public confidence that remains in the Control Yuan will sour and political influence could act as the casting vote where profitable.

Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) may have detected the danger in this, not to mention the gross injustice. On Thursday last week, he made special mention of Daniel Wu (吳德榮), a senior forecaster and head of the CWB’s forecast center who retired early after its pitiful treatment at the hands of the president.

The premier said: “Launching attacks on civil servants who are faithful to their duties and perform well, sapping their morale, will negatively influence the growth of society and impede the nation’s progress. Civil servants should be appraised justly.”

Hear, hear. If only the Control Yuan, and the president, understood why.

Source: Taipei Times - Editorials 2009/10/17



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Facebook! Twitter!  
 

Newsflash

After months of meetings, a Ministry of Education (MOE) task force charged with revising high school curriculums is coming close to approving a version that will increase emphasis on Chinese history over world history, education activists said yesterday.

Groups protesting the revision said they feared the move could have a spillover effect onto other historical issues including changes on how the 228 Incident and the Kaohsiung Incident are portrayed in relation to the development of Taiwan’s democracy.